(defrecord [rsym fields & impls])(defrecord name [fields*] options* specs*)
Currently there are no options.
Each spec consists of a protocol or interface name followed by zero
or more method bodies:
protocol-or-Object
(methodName [args*] body)*
The record will have the (immutable) fields named by
fields, which can have type hints. Protocols and methods
are optional. The only methods that can be supplied are those
declared in the protocols. Note that method bodies are
not closures, the local environment includes only the named fields,
and those fields can be accessed directly.
Method definitions take the form:
(methodname [args*] body)
The argument and return types can be hinted on the arg and
methodname symbols. If not supplied, they will be inferred, so type
hints should be reserved for disambiguation.
Methods should be supplied for all methods of the desired
protocol(s). You can also define overrides for
methods of Object. Note that a parameter must be supplied to
correspond to the target object ('this' in JavaScript parlance). Note also
that recur calls to the method head should *not* pass the target object, it
will be supplied automatically and can not be substituted.
In the method bodies, the (unqualified) name can be used to name the
class (for calls to new, instance? etc).
The type will have implementations of several ClojureScript
protocol generated automatically: IMeta/IWithMeta (metadata support) and
IMap, etc.
In addition, defrecord will define type-and-value-based =,
and will define ClojureScript IHash and IEquiv.
Two constructors will be defined, one taking the designated fields
followed by a metadata map (nil for none) and an extension field
map (nil for none), and one taking only the fields (using nil for
meta and extension fields). Note that the field names __meta
and __extmap are currently reserved and should not be used when
defining your own records.
Given (defrecord TypeName ...), two factory functions will be
defined: ->TypeName, taking positional parameters for the fields,
and map->TypeName, taking a map of keywords to field values.
Examples
No examples yet. Be the first to add one!